The Bible isn't a "scientific book"?
Sometimes I hear it
said that the Bible isn’t a "scientific book” in the sense that it doesn't present observable evidence. You want
“scientific”? Try this: “You will surely die” (Genesis 2:17).
The Word Became Flesh? Why John 1:14 Does NOT Say that God Became Man
For an audio podcast of this post, click here : For many Trinitarians, or for those who believe in the “deity of Christ”, a few words from John 1:1 combined with a few words from John 1:14 forms the , and I mean the #1 evidence that Jesus is God, and that therefor somehow God is a Trinity. John 1:1 says “the Word was God”, and then skip down to John 1:14, “the Word became flesh”. That’s it. Jesus is God, literally. But wait a second. Problems with the Trinitarian and Deity of Christ Interpretation of John 1:14 The “deity of Christ” interpretation of John 1:14 may sound plausible at first, but a little closer examination shows that the interpretation is only a thin veneer and that there is no substance behind the veneer. The “God became man” interpretation ends up being a confusing web of inconsistencies, contradictions and lies. The first observation about interpreting John 1:1 and John 1:14 as saying that “God became man”: No Trinity There is n...
Comments