Gehenna was not a continual burning fire in the Hinnom Valley

The word Gehenna is a Greek transliteration of the Hebrew “Gei–Hinnom”, the “Valley of Hinnom” which defines Jerusalem’s western and southern sides. Although the “constantly burning refuse” description is a favorite for tour guides and pastors, Gehenna has nothing to do with a continual burning of garbage in the Valley of Hinnom during the time of Jesus. This idea of continual garbage burning appears first from a medieval Jewish commentator, David Kimchi (ca. AD 1200), but it is wrong. Here is why:

1.       As mentioned above, there is no evidence in contemporaneous Second Temple Period sources (the time of Jesus) of a refuse fire constantly burning in the Hinnom Valley. The idea apparently originates from Rabbi David Kimchi’s commentary on Psalm 27:13 which dates to over 1000 years after Jesus (ca. AD 1200). Kimchi wrote: “Gehenna is a repugnant place, into which filth and cadavers are thrown, and in which fires perpetually burn in order to consume the filth and bones; on which account, by analogy, the judgment of the wicked is called ‘Gehenna.’”

Note however, that even Kimchi’s quote relates predominately to fire used for the elimination of “cadavers…filth and bones”. That is, whatever fire Kimchi had in mind was for the destruction or elimination, not conscious torment, of the human corpse. For a Jew, respectful burial is a necessary and high honor. Disposal by fire is dishonorable. Kimchi is commenting on those who will not “see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living” (Psalm 27:13) as opposed to those who will.

2.       There is no archaeological evidence of a continually burning refuse fire from the 2nd Temple Period, or any other period, in the Hinnom Valley.

3.       Garbage that burns is a relatively recent phenomenon. One look in a modern trash can shows that our garbage sure would make a nice fire as it is made up mostly of paper and plastic. But it is almost all recent “junk”. Most garbage in the Second Temple Period would not have the same flammable character: broken pot shards, some food scraps, etc., and many of these items would be used secondarily, e.g., food scraps for animal feed and flammable objects for  controlled heating.

4.       Jerusalem receives an average of more than 20 inches of rainfall a year, and it all comes in a period of about four months (Dec-March). During these months the rain can come down in sheets for days at a time. Nothing outside would keep burning.

5.       During the long dry summer, if a fire started in the Hinnom Valley or anywhere else in the land of Israel, people would immediately put it out, as there would be a danger of a spreading brush fire. Southern California has a similar climate to Israel. Just as in California, there is a reason fires are not left burning.

6.       The Hinnom Valley defines the southern and western sides of the ancient city of Jerusalem. The prevailing westerly winds would push any acrid smoke from such a fire right into the city.

These six reasons are enough to show that the “continual burning in the Hinnom Valley” is an unlikely suggestion as to why the Valley of the Sons of Hinnom became associated with a destructive fire. See also here and here for similar evidence.

 The association of Gehenna as a perpetual conscious torment of “hell” is also misplaced.

We need to look no further than the Bible for why Gai-Hinnom (Gehenna) came to be the example of how God will judge and purge sin from the land with a relatively quick, but devastating, judgment. The people of Israel were sacrificing their children by fire to a pagan god in this valley. This activity is the epitome of how far man can stray from God. God said – “I will destroy it…This sin will be stopped…I will make it a valley of slaughter…and their dead bodies will be food for the birds of the air” (Jeremiah 7:31-33, 19:4-7).

But carrion birds, wild animals and worms were sometimes not quick enough to remove decaying human bodies. In some cases, when the bodies were so many, fire would be used. One of the main reasons that corpses were burned in ancient Israel, usually those of the enemy, was to dispose of them following devastation in battle. 

In Jeremiah's day, the people were making their children pass through fire (7:31). The Lord God said the judgment upon the people would include fire (Jer. 15:14, 21:12). In addition to the destruction of the city of Jerusalem by fire, many killed at the time would have been eliminated by fire rather than honorable burial.

Another illustration of  a multitude of corpses which required removal by burning comes from the book of Isaiah 66:24 where following the devastation of the Assyrian troops of Sennecharib around 700 BC by the messenger of Yahweh: "behold, they were all dead corpses"(Isa. 37:36). Enemy corpses could be so many that they had to be eliminated by fire instead of by burial or by carrion animals.

The decimation of the Assyrian army by a relatively quick judgment of warfare or plague from Yahweh left multiple dead bodies that, already starting to decompose, required disposal by fire. The prophet Isaiah said concerning the dead who had been enemies of Yahweh: “their worm does not die and their fire is not quenched”. The worm and fire may persist, but the person is consumed, gone. Isaiah had the perfect object lesson for Yahweh's enemies, including some from Judah. Don’t rebel against Yahweh. You’ll end up like them!

According to the Bible the judgment on sin is death (Gen. 2:17, Rom. 6:23) and destruction (Matt. 7:13) and perishing (John 3:16).  Death is the end of life and results in decomposition of human bodies by the worm, or if necessary in severe cases like war, by fire.

Rather than an eternal conscience torment in a disembodied soul in "hell", the lesson of Gehenna is a dishonorable fiery destruction and elimination.

Comments

Jon Nelson said…
Great insights. Have you noticed the similarities between Daniel 12:2 and Isaiah 66:24? They both describe an end-of-times type of"eternal" judgement, and both use the word "דראון" (translated as contempt/abhorrence)- which is used only in these two places in the whole OT. Daniel seems to be describing the final resurrection of the righteous and unrighteous, and contrasts the "everlasting/eternal life" that the righteous receive with the eternal "shame" and "contempt" that the others receive. I see how one might assume that that means eternal death or punishment since the prophecy is contrasting eternal life/reward... However, even here, the "others" that are not "written in the book" [12:1] and that are raised for eternal contempt [12:2] are NOT said to be punished--only eternally shamed.
Bill Schlegel said…
Jon, Interesting that דראון is only in those two locations in the Tanach.

One can't help but see some connection in the prophets' minds. I wish we had a bit more to go on as to what the word really means. Dan. 12:2 does have the parallel חֲרָפ֖וֹת. If you are familiar with the word used anywhere else in Jewish literature, even in verbal form, I'd be interested to know.

It looks to me that, especially in Isa. 66:24, the "shame, contempt, abhorrence" is something that others look upon and perceive of those not receiving life. That is, for a person to experience perishing and then shameful disposal by burning, worms, wild birds or animals - others looking upon the spectacle are abhorred by it. (??)
Jon Nelson said…
Yes, it might be more of an everlasting shame for those that look upon their destruction (which is more in line with the verse in Isaiah 66)- though I think it could also be a warning to those that are destroyed, since no one wants to be the source of shame and contempt. That would indeed be a shameful way to be remembered!

That word "חֲרָפ֖וֹת" is simply the plural of the word חרפה (shame/contempt)- used until today in modern Hebrew in the express "בושה וחרפה"= "What a disgrace!"

The word appears in many places, such as in Genesis 34:14 "We cannot do this thing, to give our sister to one that is uncircumcised; for that were a reproach unto us" (reproach= חרפה)
Bill Schlegel said…
Jon, thanks. Also, if you run into any other uses of דראון (in noun or verbal forms) please let me know. Thanks.

Popular posts from this blog

The Word Became Flesh? Why John 1:14 Does NOT Say that God Became Man

Hebrews 1:8-14, Is the Son called God? Did Jesus create the heavens?

John 1:1 The Beginning of God's New Creation