Trinitarian, do you love God's child, the person who believes that Jesus is the Christ? Comments on 1 John 5:1
To hear on One God Report podcast, click here.
1 John 5 was especially significant for our
family several years ago when I was coming to understand that God is
One and that Jesus is God's human Messiah. My wife points out the irony in the
fact that while Trinitarians often go to the Gospel of John and the Epistle of
1 John for presumed evidences of the deity of Jesus, it was these two books of the Bible that showed us that God is One person, and that Jesus is God’s designated human
Messiah (Christ).
1 John 5:1 “Everyone
who believes that Jesus is the Christ (Messiah) has been born of God,
and everyone who loves the Father loves whomever has been born of Him.”
How tragic that people who believe that Jesus
is God condemn those who believe that Jesus is the Christ (Messiah). The "diety of Christ" believers say
that unless you believe that Jesus is God, you are “denying Christ”. What a
strange twist of Scripture. The Scripture says that “anyone who believes that
Jesus is the Christ (Messiah) is born of God…”
This Scripture does NOT say you are
born of God if you believe that:
· Jesus is a God-Man
· Jesus is co-eternal (“pre-existing”) and co-equal to the God the Father
· Jesus is of the same substance as God, the Father.
· Jesus is one person of a trinity in a godhead.
· Jesus is God who dressed up or came to earth in human flesh.
In short, Scriptures like 1 John do not say you are born of God by believing that Jesus is God. You are not born of God by believing that Jesus is a god-man. You are born of God if you believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Messiah of God.
If believing that Jesus is
the Christ (Messiah) does not mean that Jesus is God, what does "Jesus is the Christ" mean? We can't just make up our own definition of what "Christ" means and say, "If you don't believe our definition of Christ, you are denying Christ". No, we need to understand and accept the biblical definition of what "Christ, Messiah, משיח" means.
Are you changing the biblical meaning of Christ (Messiah) by claiming the "deity of Messiah", the "deity of Christ"? It seems to me that many Christians think "Christ" is a title for God. Not in the Bible.
But before looking closer at the title "Christ, Messiah", consider first the name Jesus. “Jesus” is the name of the human person, born in Bethlehem of Judea some 2000 years ago. Jesus was born, was circumcised, and was a child who grew in wisdom and stature and in favor with God (Luke 2:52). "Jesus" is not the name of a pre-existent person of an eternal
godhead (Matt. 1:25, Luke 2:21).
This human Jesus, a descendant of King David, is the Christ
(Messiah). As mentioned, many people seem to think that “Christ” is a title for deity. It
most definitely is not. Christ/Messiah is never, never, ever God in
the Bible. To make "Christ" a title of deity is a perversion of Scripture.
“Christ” (in Hebrew, “Messiah" משיח) means “anointed”. Grammatically,
the word is an adjective with a passive sense. One who is anointed has been
acted upon by someone else. The one doing the anointing is not the anointed. In
the Bible, God is the Anointer, and the one whom God has anointed is the Christ
(the Messiah). The Anointer (God) is not the Anointed (Christ).
To be anointed meant to be chosen by God for a
specific role or task. The Persian king Cyrus was anointed by God as a Messiah/Christ
for the role of restoring God’s people to their land (Isa. 45:1). Aaron and his
descendants were anointed to serve God as priests (Exo. 28:31,
30:30). King Saul was anointed by God to be Israel's first king (1 Samuel 10:1, 24:6). David and his descendants were selected, designated, that is, anointed by God (through
human agents) to be king (1 Sam. 16:12, 1 Kings 1:34, cf. 1 Sam. 15:1, 2 Kings
9:3).
This is the essence of what “Christ/Messiah” means: to be the God-chosen, God-designated, God-equipped, human priest and/or king. To believe that Jesus is
the Christ means to believe that Jesus is a human being anointed by God.
The Christ/Messiah in the Bible can’t be God,
because it is God who chose and anointed the Christ. The Christ/Messiah can't be God because in the New Testament the Christ was put to death by crucifixion (1 Cor. 1:23, 2:2). God does not die.
In the Bible, Jesus is the Christ of
God, never the Christ who is God.
·
“He (Jesus) said to them, ‘But who do
you say that I am?’ Peter answered, ‘The Christ of God.’” (Luke
9:20).
·
“But what God foretold by the
mouth of all the prophets, that His Christ should suffer, he thus
fulfilled” (Acts 3:18).
Son of God or God the Son?
This same human Jesus who is the Christ is the
“Son of God” (1 John 5:5). While there are other human sons of God in the Bible (Exo. 4:22, John 1:12, Gal/ 3:26), "Son of God" is a title which came to be parallel to and in many ways
synonymous with “Messiah/Christ” (2 Sam. 7:14, Psa. 2:1-7, 1 Chron. 28:6). The anointed king descended from David is the Son of God.
“Son of God” does not mean “God the Son”. There is no “God the Son” in the Bible. The title “God the Son” is an invention of the human mind. God is not a son. See here for "Son of God in the Bible"
“Son of God” does not mean “God the Son”. There is no “God the Son” in the Bible. The title “God the Son” is an invention of the human mind. God is not a son. See here for "Son of God in the Bible"
Do you love God’s child? Do you love the Father of God's child?
1 John 5:1 says that the person who believes that Jesus is
the Christ (Messiah) has been born of God. If you love God, you will love the
person, God’s child who has been born of God, the person who believes that Jesus is the Christ. If do not love that
person, or shun or reject that person, or call that person a heretic, or say that person has denied Christ, the implication
is that you do not love the Father (God). Because whoever loves God, the Father, loves God’s child who is born of God.
Let me repeat that. If you reject as a heretic
someone who believes that Jesus is the Christ (the Messiah), the
implication is that you do not love God, the Father of that person.
If you are a pastor of a church or a church member, and someone tells you that they believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Christ, but not literally God, would you condemn that person, and tell his wife that her husband is a dangerous heretic, sowing discord in his family. If you would do that, 1 John 5:1 is pretty clear: you don't love God, the Father of that person.
Do you love God’s child? Do you love the person born of God who believes believes
that Jesus is the Messiah? If you don't love the person born of God, but condemn them and shun them and call him or her a heretic, take a look at 1 John 5:1. Perhaps you don't love the Father the way you think you do.
Comments
Thanks, I really needed to hear that word.
It's all very un-biblical.
Blessings in Jesus the Christ, the first-born from the dead.
I understand and agree with most of everything you say about Christ in his role as the Messiah.
You perfectly describe the Messiah, the Christ.
As the Christ, on earth, Philippians 2:6-8 explains that while the Christ, the Word put aside all His divinity. He functioned only as a a human with the help of the Holy Spirit. To be a perfect sacrifice he had to, and did remain sinless using only his human capabilities.
He was born sinless, as the Word who put on flesh, the Son, begotten by the Father and remained so.
But if you deny the Word’s divinity ,how do you explain John 1:1 and 1:14 ?
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. - John 1:1
And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth. - John 1:14
The Word, who according to John, was God, and with God at the beginning, put on flesh and became Jesus, the Christ . Does that make the Word no longer God?
Charles E Coco “Ed”
I don’t accept the Trinitarian interpretations of the Gospel of John’s introduction (John 1:1-18) or of Philippians 2. There are so many presuppositions and problems with the trinitarian interpretations of these Scriptures. Starting with “In the beginning” in John 1:1. While “in the beginning” is an allusion to the Genesis creation (because God is bringing about a new creation in and through Jesus), John 1:1 is not directly describing the Genesis creation. I would suggest doing a word study on “the beginning” in John’s Gospel and John’s epistles. You will see that it does not refer to the Genesis creation, but to the ministry of Jesus (cf. also Mark 1:1, Luke 1:3). Even from a Trinitarian perspective, it doesn’t make sense to say, in connection to “the beginning”, the Word was first.
It’s also important to note that the word often translated by Trinitarian translators in John 1 as “became” or “made” can be understood, and I believe preferably so in John 1, as “was, were, happened, came about”. For instance, instead of “All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made” (John 1:3), read the verse as “All things happened through him, and without him nothing happened that happened”, understanding that everything that John is about to describe in his Gospel occurred because of God’s work through Jesus.
The same word that Trinitarian translators translated as “was made” in John 1:3, 10, 14 (egeneto), also occurs in John 1:6 and 1:17 (and many other in John’s Gospel, meaning simply “was, occurred, happened”.
John 1:6: “There was (egeneto) a man sent from God, whose name was John.”
John 1:17: “For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came (egeneto) through Jesus Christ.”
John 1:28 “This took place (egeneto) in Bethany beyond the Jordan, where John was baptizing.”
In the same way that John 1:17 tells us that grace and truth came/happened/were through Jesus Christ, so John 1:3 tells us that “all things happened through him”.
A curious Trinitarian should ask why the same word is translated so differently in the same chapter. Is there a translation bias to insert a theological presupposition into the text? I believe so.
(continued....)
Continuing from above....
Philippians 2 describes how the human Jesus, designated by God to be king on earth, now exalted to heaven, humbled himself on earth to the point of death. There is no description of a pre-existing 2nd person of a “god-head” leaving heaven. It is Christ Jesus who had this mind, the name and title for Jesus when he was on earth, never a name or title of deity. It is the man Christ Jesus who humbled himself to death on a cross.
Again, the Trinitarian interpretation doesn’t work. The Trinitarian interpretation would have us believe that god-person #2 humbled himself and took on flesh (didn’t become a human person, only took on flesh), then died (the god-person died?). God-person #1, who is the God of God-person #2, re-exalted God-person #2, gave him the name Jesus, so that everyone would bow to God-person #2, to the glory of God person #1.
Doesn’t work.
I’ll put a link or two below if you want to search things out more.
Finally, allow me to suggest, don’t allow assumptions or presuppositions on a few verses that you think show the “deity of Christ” to cause you to miss the clear statements in the Bible about who the Messiah Jesus is. There are clear statements in the Bible that state that Jesus is a human person, who has a God (same God as you and me). This Jesus, the Messiah, died, but was raised from the dead by God. The clear statements in the New Testament is “Jesus is the Christ”, not “Jesus is God”, or “God is the Christ”.
Don't condemn anyone who believe that the human person Jesus is the Christ, the Messiah. If you do, you may be found to be opposing God's child.
Trinity Delusion website articles and vidoes
http://www.angelfire.com/space/thegospeltruth/trinity.html
Misunderstood texts about Jesus (including Phil. 2)
https://restitutio.org/2018/12/06/interview-46-misunderstood-texts-about-jesus-4-bill-schlegel/
“Pre-existence” Denies the Humanity of Jesus
http://www.onegodreport.com/preexistence_denies_the_humanity_of_jesus
Blessings in Jesus the Messiah, the firstborn from the dead!
Fernando Coutinho, Mérida Venezuela.