In the Gospel of John, Jesus is the Messiah, not God
In a recent article/podcast,
we saw that the word or title “God” in the New Testament, including in the
Gospel of John, never means the Trinity.
In this podcast we will see that in the Gospel
of John, Jesus is declared to be the Messiah, not God.
The biblical autumn festivals are coming up,
including the of Festival of Tabernacles. John 7 describes how Jesus went to
Jerusalem for the Tabernacles festival, only six months before he was crucified,
buried and raised from the dead.
In reading over John chapter 7, I’m struck by
how the question on the people’s minds in Jerusalem at the Festival was not
“Is this man God?”. Rather, the question
people were asking themselves was “Is this man the Messiah?” For
centuries, deity of Christ and Trinitarian theology have claimed that the
Gospel of John is the book that presents Jesus as God. But
to make that claim a person has to bring his own presuppositions to a few verses
in John’s Gospel, while at the same time ignore the many times that John is
really presenting Jesus as the Messiah.
Unfortunately, in much of today’s Gentile
world, people have come to associate the title “Christ”, the Greek word
for Messiah, with deity. But in the Bible the Messiah, the Christ
is never God himself. In the Bible the Messiah, Christ is a human person, most
prominently a king or priest, who is chosen and anointed by God. The word
Messiah, Christ means “anointed”.
John’s Gospel never says “Jesus Christ is God.”
On the other hand, the question, “Is Jesus the Messiah?” is a central theme that
appears over and over again in the Gospel of John. John’s Gospel tells us that
Jesus is the Messiah in the first chapter, in a comparison with Moses. John
1:17 says, “The Torah (Law) came through Moses, but grace and truth came
through Jesus the Messiah”. John 1:17 does not say “grace and truth came
through the god man Jesus Christ”. Or, “grace and truth came through the
eternal second person of the trinity”. Rather, Jesus is parallel to Moses, not
God. Both Moses and Jesus the Messiah were human channels through whom God
worked.
Also in the first chapter of John’s Gospel,
people wondered if perhaps John the Baptist was the Messiah. John the Baptist
made it clear: “I am not the Messiah” (John 1:20, 25; 3:28). Then, still
within John’s first chapter (John 1:41), we are presented with the declaration
of Andrew to his brother Peter: “We have found the Messiah!’ (which
means Christ)”. What excitement must have been in Andrew’s voice! His
people had been waiting hundreds of years for God to send the Messiah,
and Andrew believed that the time, and the person, had arrived! It is also
interesting to note that the author of the Gospel felt it necessary to
translate the meaning of the word Messiah, “which
means Christ”. Again, Messiah doesn’t mean “God”.
In John’s Gospel even a Samaritan woman knew
that “Messiah is coming (he who is called Christ). When he comes, he
will tell us all things" (John 4:25). In the next verse Jesus told her
that he is the Messiah, saying “I am”, meaning “I am the Messiah”. Then
the woman went to the people in her town declaring, “Come, see a man who
told me all that I ever did. Can this be the Messiah?" (John 4:29).
Just before Jesus came to Jerusalem during the
Festival of Tabernacles (7:1), as John 7:5 tells us, “even his brothers did not
believe in him”. This means that at this point in time Jesus’s brothers didn’t
believe that Jesus was the Messiah. There is no way John’s Gospel would
be telling us that Jesus’s brothers didn’t believe that Jesus was God. That
would be an absurdity. Jesus’s brothers, Jews from Galilee, knew Jesus was a
human being whom they had grown up with. The question was not if this human
being was God. The question
was, is this human being the Messiah.
At the festival Jesus differentiated between
God on the one hand, and himself on the other. “My teaching is not mine, but His
who sent me. If anyone's will is to do God's will, he will know whether the
teaching is from God or whether I am speaking on my own authority” (John
7:16-17). In John's Gospel Jesus repeatedly distinguished himself from God.
In the next chapter of John’s Gospel, Jesus distinguished himself from God, saying, “but now you seek to kill me,
a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God
(John 8:40).
Some Jerusalemites at the Festival of
Tabernacles asked, “Can it be that the authorities really know that this is the
Messiah?” (John 7:26). They pondered the question of where Messiah
was to come from (7:27). “Yet many of the people believed in him. They
said, "When the Messiah appears, will he do more signs than this
man has done?” (7:31). The people who believed in Jesus believed that Jesus was
the Messiah, not God. They believed that Jesus was the Messiah of
God.
As an aside: that the Gospel of John is
declaring that Jesus is the Messiah, not God, is in agreement with the other
synoptic Gospels. As recorded in Luke 9:20, when Jesus asked the apostles who
they thought Jesus was, Peter answered “The Messiah of God.” Jesus commended
Peter’s confession, telling Peter that he was blessed to know this (Matt.
16:17). Like liberal theologians, deity of Christ proponents seem to think that
the Gospel of John is presenting a different Messiah than Matthew, Mark and
Luke. But this is only because they are both misreading John’s Gospel. Just
like Matthew, Mark and Luke, John proclaims that Jesus is Messiah, not God.
Back to the Gospel of John. The last day of the
Festival of Tabernacles is known as the Great Day, today also called Simchat
Torah (Rejoicing over the Torah/Law, John 7:37. cf. John 7:19, “Did not
Moses give you the Torah/Law”). On that Great Day Jesus stood up and proclaimed
that he was God’s channel of life-giving water or spirit. When the people heard
these words, some acknowledged that Jesus was the Prophet like unto Moses that
God would send to Israel (John 7:40, Deut. 18:18, Acts 3:22-23). “Others said,
‘This is the Messiah’” (John 7:41). Belief in Jesus meant believing that
Jesus is the Messiah, not that Jesus is God.
Some in Jerusalem that day were skeptical that
Jesus was the Messiah because of where Jesus grew up, questioning also if Jesus
was a descendent of David. “Is the Messiah to come from Galilee? Has not the Scripture said that the Messiah
comes from the offspring of David, and comes from Bethlehem, the village where
David was?” (John 7:41-42). They were apparently ignorant of the fact that
Jesus was a descendant of David, born in Bethlehem.
But the question on people’s minds in Jerusalem
that Festival of Tabernacles was not, “Is this man God, or a god/man?” The
question was, “Is this man the Messiah, descended from David?”
Not many days after that Festival of
Tabernacles, perhaps Jesus was even still in Jerusalem after the festival,
Jesus healed a blind man in the city. The question also then was, “Is Jesus the
Messiah?” “The Judeans had already agreed that if anyone should confess Jesus
to be Messiah, he was to be put out of the synagogue” (John 9:22). There
is no question at all if Jesus was God dressed up in human flesh, which would
be an absurdity.
At Hanukkah, back in Jerusalem later the same
year, only about four months before Jesus was put to death, the Gospel of John
tells us that Judeans confronted Jesus with this challenge: “If you are the Messiah,
tell us plainly” (John 10:24). Jesus replied that he had already told them so,
and that both his words and the works he did testified that he was the
Messiah.
Just before raising Lazarus from the dead,
Martha declared, “"Yes, Lord; I believe that you are the Messiah,
the Son of God, who is coming into the world” (John 11:27). Martha doesn’t
declare that Jesus is God, but rather that Jesus is Messiah and Son
of God. Son of God is the biblical title for the coming Messiah King (2
Sam. 7:14, Psa. 2:1-7, 1 Chron. 28:6, John 1:49). Son of God does not mean God
the Son. In the Bible, God is never a son, but is always
the Father.
After Jesus rode into Jerusalem on a donkey
just before the Passover when he was crucified and raised from the dead, the
question about Jesus was whether he was the Messiah, not God (John 12:12-15,
34).
Less than a day before Jesus’s death, Jesus
prayed to God, “Father… this
is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus the Messiah
whom you have sent” (John 17:3). Jesus’s prayer to God shows us plainly that Jesus
knew he was the Messiah, not God. To Jesus, the Father is the only God.
Finally, the author of the Gospel of John told
us the reason he recorded the miracles or signs that Jesus did: “these are
written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of
God, and that by believing you may have life in his name” (John 20:31). This is
a kind of purpose statement for the entire Gospel of John. John didn’t write so
that we would believe that Jesus is God, but rather that Jesus is the Messiah,
the Son of God.
It is a tragedy that later Roman and Byzantine
Christians interpreted the Jesus of the Gospel of John to be a god or God, when
John is in fact declaring that Jesus is the Messiah. The claim that the
Gospel of John presents Jesus as God is based on a few passages that are easily
and better understood differently. Like John 10:30, when Jesus said “I and the
Father are one”. Are we really to think that the man Jesus was standing in
Jerusalem claiming to be of one essence with God, a second person of a
three-person godhead? Could there be another way to understand Jesus’s
statement? Even the Protestant reformer John Calvin understood that with this
statement Jesus was claiming to be of one intention or of the same purpose as
God.
This is the situation with the handful of other
verses in the Gospel of John that are said to be evidences for the “deity of
Christ”. These statements are better understood not as claims to deity. If you
think John 1:1 is declaring that Jesus is God, or that Thomas called Jesus God,
you should read John 14:10 ("...the Father is in me...the Father dwelling in me does His works") or, listen to a couple of other One God Report podcasts like podcast #9,
“My Lord and My God, Trinitarians Get it Wrong”. To focus on a small number of
disputable texts in John’s Gospel as evidence that Jesus is a God-man, is a
kind of distraction or deflection from the truth. Like when a magician draws
one’s attention away from what is really happening. So much attention is put
upon a few disputable statements that one misses what the whole book clearly is
proclaiming over and over again.
The focus and claim of the Gospel of John is
that this man, Jesus of Nazareth, is the Messiah.
Which brings up another emphasis of John’s
Gospel that is ignored by “deity of Christ” proponents. That is, while the
Gospel of John never says that Jesus is God, it says repeatedly
that Jesus is a man. Sixteen times Jesus is specifically said to be a man in
John’s Gospel, and another thirteen times he is called the son of man, which in
Hebrew means literally a son of Adam. Remember what Jesus told his enemies in
John 8:40: “But now you seek to kill me, a man who has told you
the truth which I heard from God.”
To proclaim “Jesus is God” and that the Gospel
of John says so, is to proclaim a different Jesus, a different Messiah than the
one the Gospel of John is proclaiming. “Jesus is God” is an anti-messiah claim,
a claim that exchanges the real human Christ of the Gospel of John for
another. It is a claim that is against the real human Messiah Jesus of the
Gospel of John.
As presented in John’s Gospel, and indeed all
of the New Testament, those that believe in Jesus do not believe
that Jesus is God. Rather, those that believe in Jesus believe that Jesus is
the Messiah. “Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Messiah has
been born of God” (1 John 5:1).
It is a misrepresentation and perversion of
Scripture to insist that “everyone who believes that Jesus is God has been born
of God”.
Comments
In John 20:24-29 we see Thomas being convinced that his God had raised his Lord from the dead. Thomas is praising both his God, and his Lord.
In Matthew 1:23 Jesus is NOT "God with us". Jesus is given a NAME "Immanuel", which is interpreted "God is with us". It is from the same Hebrew word as this text; Gen 21:22
22 And it came to pass at that time, that Abimelech and Phichol the chief captain of his host spake unto Abraham, saying, God is with thee in all that thou doest:
I think a better wording is: "The word is NOT a person, BUT God's words define Him ... which is the meaning of the statement "the word was God".
Here is the John 20:28, "My Lord and my God" article.
https://landandbible.blogspot.com/2019/12/my-lord-and-my-god-trinitarians-get-it.html
This ideology has entrenched our thinking that I have found it necessary to make a clear distinction in my conversations with others.
That you for the article Bill
Tony