Did God become man? (Philippians 2:5-11)
Does Philippians 2:5-11 describe the eternal God the Son
humbling himself to become man?
We think not.
These are notes for the One
God Report podcast in which we explain some problems and contradictions
with the "deity of Christ" interpretation of Philippians 2, and
suggest a better way to understand this portion of Scripture:
When Christ Jesus "emptied" and
"humbled" himself, he was already a human being. The acts of emptying
and humbling himself relate to his obedience to die on the cross, not "to
become a human being".
1. The context of the Letter to the Philippians shows that
Paul is talking about the human being, Jesus Christ. Throughout Philippians, as throughout all of Paul's letters, the Lord Jesus Christ is distinguished from God. That is, the Lord Jesus Christ is someone who is not God, but has a God (1:2, 1:11, 2:9, 2:11, 3:3, 4:19-20). The context of these four verses (2:5-8) is not the "deity of Christ", but an admonition for humility toward unity among believers.
2. Paul is describing
the mind of Christ Jesus, the title (Christ/Messiah) and name (Jesus) of the
human being, not of an assumed pre-incarnate "Second Person of the
Godhead". Even in "deity of Christ" theology the "pre-incarnate second person of the godhead" is not Jesus the Messiah.
3. Paul expects his readers to have the same mind that the Christ Jesus had and has, which would be impossible if Paul was referring to an
eternally pre-existent God who became a man and is now God again. Paul is calling for a humility of mind among believers to preserve unity among the body of believers.
4. As in many other
places in his writings, in this passage Paul differentiates four times between
God and Jesus Christ (2:6, 9, 11). God is someone other than Jesus Christ, and Jesus Christ
is someone other than God.
5. Being in "the form of God" means Jesus is not
God. The word for "form" does not have reference to the metaphysical
nature of Jesus, i.e., Paul is not stating that Jesus is the same metaphysical “substance”
as God. The NIV translation "who being in very nature God" is obviously theologically motivated and can be confidently rejected. The Greek word translated as "form" (morphe) has to do with outward appearance. The man Jesus represented God, just like a footprint in cement represents a foot. The footprint is not the foot.
6. As the sent, obedient Son of God, Messiah, Jesus has a
certain representative, functional equality with God that Jesus knows is given
to him by God. Jesus knows he does not have to either seize or hold on to that
equality. Jesus is confident and secure in his authorization by God. He has
authority to represent God because God has given the authority to him.
7. Jesus
"being/being made in the likeness of men, in the fashion of men"
(2:7-8) means that Jesus is a human being.
5. The human Christ Jesus "emptied himself",
taking on the form of a servant. Having the prerogatives as God's unique son, the King of Israel, empowered and equipped by God, able to give sight to the blind and raise the dead - yet Jesus took the form of a servant. Paul does not say that Christ Jesus
"emptied himself" of his deity to become a man, but that he
"emptied himself, taking on the form of a servant".
6. Christ Jesus's obedience to the Father is not a pre-incarnate act that involved one god-person "taking on human nature". Rather, the man Jesus Christ was obedient to God, to the extent of death
on a cross. The acts of obedience (to the point of dieing) were made by the man Christ Jesus, as a human being.
This also means that Jesus is not God - he is obedient to God, and God does not die.
This also means that Jesus is not God - he is obedient to God, and God does not die.
7. God exalted Jesus
Christ and gave him a name above all names ("at the name of Jesus every knee will bow"). This means that Jesus is not God,
since God exalted Jesus, and gave Jesus a name.
8. Jesus Christ's exaltation and glory is never described as
something he "gave up" and then "received back" again.
Rather, his exaltation and glory is something he received only after his death.
9. Interpreting passages like Philippians 2:5-9 (cf. also
Colossians 1:15-19, Hebrews 1) as describing the “deity of Christ” has a
certain sinister, even satanic motivation. The “deity of Christ”
interpretations of these passages attempt to rob the man Jesus the Messiah of
who he is and what he did as a human being. In this way the "deity of
Christ" interpretations are anti-Messiah, anti-Christ.
“Deity of Christ” interpretations, when unmasked, are an
expression of satanic jealousy. The “deity of Christ” interpretation of Philippians
2:5-8 ignores and attempts to deflect who the man Messiah Jesus is, and what he
did, and attempts to give his glory to some non-existent pre-incarnate being. “The
man Jesus Christ didn’t humble himself in Philippians 2.” To claim that Philippians 2 is describing the mindset and actions of a pre-incarnate god-person is an attempt to dishonor the man Christ Jesus.
But Yawheh (God) says to the man Christ Jesus, “Sit at my
right hand. Rule the Earth. Let all God’s angels worship him (Gen. 1:26, Psalm
2:6-8, Psalm 8:3-9, Psalm 110:1-2, Heb. 1:6, 1 Pet. 3:22). Will you and I bow
the knee to God's designated human Messiah Jesus, or will we continue to insist
that Jesus must be "pre-existent God who took on human flesh” before we
bow the knee to him, refusing God's Messiah and God's will for us?
Comments